Project

Profile

Help

HostedRedmine.com has moved to the Planio platform. All logins and passwords remained the same. All users will be able to login and use Redmine just as before. Read more...
Send by e-mail

Feature #765945

Introduce clause_info structure

Added by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Marko Lindqvist
Category:
General
Sprint/Milestone:
3.1.0
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Initial version of the clause type specific clause_info structure contains information whether clause type is enabled in the game. This information is copied from game.info fields.

0011-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch (7.04 KB) 0011-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch Marko Lindqvist, 2018-07-21 03:12 PM
0004-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch (7.04 KB) 0004-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch Marko Lindqvist, 2018-07-29 03:23 PM
0003-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch (7.09 KB) 0003-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch Marko Lindqvist, 2018-07-31 07:21 PM
0010-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch (24.2 KB) 0010-Introduce-clause_info-structure.patch Marko Lindqvist, 2018-08-02 06:49 PM

History

#1 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

#3 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress

Those clause types that are not configurable are always disabled. They should be always enabled.

#4 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

- Enable clauses that are not explicitly configurable

#5 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress

#6 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

- Make it completely separate from those server settings to avoid bad interactions
- Read information from the ruleset instead, and support all clause types in that
- Send information to client too

#7 Updated by Jacob Nevins about 4 years ago

Where are you going with this?

I've had some vague thoughts recently about ruleset-defined pacts (with no immediate plans to flesh them out) -- sounds like you're heading in about the same direction?

#8 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

Jacob Nevins wrote:

Where are you going with this?

The main thing is Feature #768208. I don't yet have much ideas beyond that.

#9 Updated by Marko Lindqvist about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Assignee set to Marko Lindqvist
Send by e-mail

Also available in: Atom PDF