HostedRedmine.com has moved to the Planio platform. All logins and passwords remained the same. All users will be able to login and use Redmine just as before. Read more...
Post activity Casus Belli
"Pillage" currently triggers the Casus_Belli_Success effect when the activity begins. Introduce Casus_Belli_Complete that it can trigger once the activity is done.
If you think Casus_Belli_Successful_Beginning on activity start and Casus_Belli_Success on activity completion makes more sense it will probably be easy to convince me to replace Casus_Belli_Complete with Casus_Belli_Successful_Beginning.
#4 Updated by Lexxie L about 2 years ago
Hey, I like this feature in all its forms, it solves a lot. Here are some thoughts.
Both options leave a ruleset designer some more room I guess.
When the action begins, causing casus belli can make sense because it allows you to retaliate to prevent the actual pillage. BUT it makes a potential problem that a missed key would cause diplomatic chain reactions. I guess it's not going to happen often enough to worry about, or justify coding a 1 minute delay or something like this.
Thanks for this feature. Sometimes the smallest things like this end up being huge!
#5 Updated by Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik about 2 years ago
Lexxie L wrote:
Hey, I like this feature in all its forms, it solves a lot.
I'm glad to hear it.
BUT it makes a potential problem that a missed key would cause diplomatic chain reactions.
On the other hand you risk an incident against the tile's new owner with Casus_Belli_Complete if you forget to cancel a pillage after a tile owner change.
#6 Updated by Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik about 2 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
The version that went in allowed the post successful activity start Casus Belli to keep the name Casus_Belli_Success and gave the name Casus_Belli_Complete to when the activity is done. If you think that the post activity Casus Belli should get the Casus_Belli_Success name and the post successful activity start Casus Belli should be the one to get its own name please file a feature request (or bug report) before the 3.1 data file format freeze. The important thing about the effect naming is that it is logical from a ruleset author's point of view.
Lexxie L wrote:
I guess it's not going to happen often enough to worry about, or justify coding a 1 minute delay or something like this.
File a feature request if this becomes a big problem. I can't promise a high priority but then we know that it is a big problem.